This week's listing is a genuinely good business: a 22-year-old, debt-free, market-leading countertop materials company in West Texas, throwing off $2.3M in earnings like clockwork. Nothing wrong with it.

But the way it's being sold contains one of the most important lessons in any acquisition, the difference between paying for what a business has proven and paying for what someone promises it will become. And there's a tell in this listing so sharp it tells you exactly where the seller thinks the real money is.

Let's break it down.

The Listing

  • Type: Granite/countertop materials distributor (3 locations, materials only — no installation)

  • Established: 2004 — 22 years

  • Gross Revenue: ~$9,300,000

  • Adjusted EBITDA: $2,300,000

  • Asking Price: $10,450,000 (includes $2M inventory + $1.5M equipment)

  • Real Estate: $7,000,000 — not included; available separately

  • Team: 16 · Debt-free · Seller financing available

First, look at the actual track record.

The seller helpfully lists three years of numbers:

  • 2023: $9.6M revenue, $2.3M EBITDA

  • 2024: $9.0M+ revenue, $2.4M EBITDA

  • 2025: $9.0M+ revenue, $2.3M EBITDA

Read that carefully. This is a stable business with remarkably consistent earnings, which is genuinely valuable. But it is not a growing one. Revenue actually ticked down from 2023 to 2024 and held flat. Earnings have sat at roughly $2.3M for three straight years.

That's the reality on the books: steady, dependable, flat.

Now look at how it's being sold.

The listing's growth section doesn't talk about the flat historicals. It talks about the future: a massive Oracle data center being built nearby, a Microsoft facility, and regional population that "could triple in 5–7 years." The pitch is that all this development will send countertop demand "off the charts."

Maybe it will. But notice what's happening: you're being asked to get excited about growth that has not shown up in a single year of the financials. It's all projection, all external, all dependent on other companies' construction timelines translating into countertop sales, a chain of "ifs."

The principle: pay for what a business has proven, not for the story of what it might become. Provable earnings are worth real money. A growth story is worth exactly nothing until it lands on the income statement. If the boom is real, that upside is your reward for buying and running the business, it's not something the seller gets to charge you for in advance, because they haven't produced it.

The tell that seals it: watch what the seller keeps.

Here's the sharpest detail in the whole listing. The seller is carving the $7M of real estate out of the deal with keeping the land and buildings, selling you only the operating business. The stated reason for selling is literally "real estate development and other interests."

Sit with that. The seller is telling you the region is about to explode with data-center-driven growth… and simultaneously keeping the real estate, the single asset that most directly captures a regional development boom, while selling you the countertop business.

Watch what people do, not what they say. The seller's own actions reveal where they believe the real upside is: in the dirt, not the countertops. If the growth story were as certain for the business as the pitch suggests, why part with the business and hold the land? That's not a reason to walk away but it's a reason to price the business on its proven $2.3M, not on the seller's projections.

And don't forget what you're actually buying.

Of the $10.45M asking price, $2M is inventory (roughly 7,400 stone slabs) and $1.5M is equipment. So $3.5M of the price is hard assets, not "the business."

That inventory matters more than it looks. Stone slabs are tied-up capital with $2M of a buyer's money sitting on a warehouse floor, exposed to changing tastes and carrying costs, not earning a return on its own. Inventory-heavy businesses always require the buyer to fund that working capital, and it's a real cost that a headline EBITDA number quietly ignores.

One more: because the real estate is excluded, a buyer will have to lease those three facilities back. If the current $2.3M EBITDA was earned while the owner didn't charge the business market rent, that rent expense will eat into the earnings you're buying. (We covered this "owning the building flatters the cash flow" trap in a recent issue, it applies in reverse here.)

At ~4.5x EBITDA, the price is fair for a stable, debt-free market leader. The trap is paying more than that for a growth story the seller is keeping the best seat for.

Now turn it on your own business.

Two lessons here, and they point in opposite directions depending on which side of the table you're on:

If you're ever selling: you can only charge for what you've proven. Talking about your huge growth potential doesn't move your multiple, demonstrated growth does. If you believe there's an inflection coming, the single most valuable thing you can do is put a year or two of that growth on the books before you sell. Realized growth is worth multiples more than projected growth. Sell the trend, not the hope.

To your future exit,

Andrew, Unlock Your Exit

Keep Reading